Missiles thrown at Bradford demo

Comments

[Ultimo Tiger]

I'm trying to figure out the difference between the EDL and UAF.

Can someone help me? All I see is two groups of ranting mobs trying to cause trouble for the rest of us.

[Sortyourownmessout]

Ask David Cameron, he being a UAF supporter and signatory.

I find it disgusting that politicians have created a situation where young men feel the only way of being heard means criminalising themselves and I hope this isn't a small glimpse into the future.

[southern softie]

The government must find ways to help the dissaffected young find hope.Policies to improve education and employment.
The peddlers of hate must not be allowed to succeed.

[MG]

What on earth are some of you on about. They choose to behave in this thuggish manner. I suspect half of them are in work, probably some with quite good jobs.

[James Trent]

Why are Cameron and the Conservatives continuing to allow taxpayer funds to be used to finance the thuggery of the UAF? As someone above says, Cameron is a UAF supporter and signatory and has been for a long while, one assumes he must endorse this sort of thing as he has failed to withdraw his support despite the behaviour of the UAF over the years. We must live under the most authoritarian, repressive regime in Europe and there is little sign of that changing. I can't think of one leader of any other western democracy who openly supports and funds an extreme and violent organisation like UAF.

[Paris Claims]

Ultimo Tiger,the UAF is a gang of marxist street thugs, ( and naive students)funded by the state,supported by the likes of Livingstone,Galloway,and to his eternal shame,Cameron. Their aim to to smash what is left of our democracy,and replace it with a totalitarian system.
The EDL is an organisation opposed to the islamifaction of Great Britain. Unfortunately,some nasty football-type thugs have tagged along in the hope of a punch-up. But,hey,nobody is perfect.

[Brian Junor]

"I'm trying to figure out the difference between the EDL and UAF.
Can someone help me? All I see is two groups of ranting mobs trying to cause trouble for the rest of us."

"The rest of us" have caused trouble for ourselves by never opposing Muslim immigration. If we had followed a sane immigration policy or had abandoned an insane immigration policy (say in 1968 as was suggested) the riots would simply not have happened. Moreover, if the rest of the population is paralysed by suicidal politeness over Islam only the low and the disgusting, the ranting mobs who don't care what people think, will have the guts to stand up for England and liberate the patriotism of the rest of society.