VIDEO: LibDem MP Mike Hancock denies reports that his researcher is a Russian spy
Comments
There was a delightful set of sketches on (appropriately enough) The Goon Show at the time of the Profumo scandal. Will we see Hancock's Half Hour now?
The question is, why did Mike Hancock allow her to table PQs on matters of national security when she was first suspected, very publicly, back in August? Hancock is widely known to be pro-Russian and pro-Putin (not terribly LibDem that, is it) – does he know more than he’s letting on? http://bit.ly/ihObE9
Those in favour of unlimited non-EU immigration argue that commerce would be damaged if numbers were restricted. Presumably Mr Hancock engaged Ms Zatuliveter knowing she was a foreign national and he checked her right to work here.
But why was she given any such right? Is it seriously suggested there is no other person in the UK who would act as Mr Hancock's researcher so he needed to recruit from Russia?
The naivety of the LibDems knows no bounds - an MP for a defence base city and a member of a Parliamentary group involved with defence and he engaged a Russian national - unbelievable, but true.
I couldn't care less about the girl; I think it's more likely that Hancock himself is a Russian spy.
Anyhoo, it all amounts to a rather lovely excuse to have Knacker of the Yard take a trip to chez Hancock and ask a few questions. Maybe we could get the Home Secretary and House of Commons authorities to have him removed on security grounds, at least until after the Tuition Fees vote?
Mike Hancock has some problems. He is at the moment on police bail himself and it beggars all belief that the best assistant he could find is a Russian national.
How would this silly man, our equivalent in his own quiet way of Berlusconi I fear, know whether she is a spy or not? Has he never heard for honey traps? This is also being covered on the comments page for those who might be interested. Hancock should resign. This is one serious gaff too far.
Yes, because we all know that if his researcher was in fact a russian spy Mr. Hancock would be the first to know... Given that spies have a tendency to respond favourably to the question 'sir, are you a spy?'
Mike Hancock is a typical Liberal Democrat MP who is continually asking questions about our armed forces and our defence strategy on the pretence of freedom of information and generally making a nuisance of himself in Parliament.
Why do we want Liberal Democrat MPs like this who appear not to support the government in protecting the British people?
He is currently on bail for alleged indecent assault.
He employs a Russian girl as a researcher who is alleged to be a Russian Spy.
Mr Hancock is a liability and Nick Clegg needs to deal with this man and decide if he is required as a Liberal Democrat MP especially as they now have responsibility in Government.
robert will have to work very hard to convince me that the government is currently protecting the British people. By what actions and with what resources, one wonders.
Russia is not a member of the EU. This woman came to "study" and then was allowed to stay and work. Is it seriously suggested that there are no young people here equipped and willing to be researchers for MPs? Spy or not, she should be sent home.
Hmmm so Handycock, couldn't find a researcher who just happened, 'not' to be a 25 year old Russian female with long blonde hair, but then I'm sure she was more than adequately equipped in so many other ways.
The more people try to convince me that this Coalition will last till 2015 the less convinced I am.
If Mike Hancock couldn't find anyone in Portsmouth to do the job he seems to have had in mind, it is the only dock town in the country where that is true!
Looking at comments about the other allegations and then his arreast, this bloke looks like he should not be parliament.
Added to which I think it is wrong for a MP to employ overseas staff, no wonder Liberal Democrats want an amnesty on illigal Immigrants and Unrestricted Immigration.
In a city the size of Portsmouth surely there is a British born person who could have been Hancock's personal assistant, or researcher or whatever? Why did he need to employ a Russian?
I assume the impartial commenters will also assume that any good-looking Conservative assistants also only got their job due to their looks and make similarly unfounded insinuations.
According to the Daily Mail who were obviously briefed by their favourite sppok:
" The MI5 officers who spoke to her appeared to know details of her love life, suggesting that she was under surveillance.
She is alleged to have had an affair with someone working at Nato, though a spokesman for the organisation said it had no knowledge of any such allegation."
I'd say that imply that insinuations are well founded.
I assume those who are advocating sacking this girl on the sole basis of her nationality also support sacking all the American interns and researchers that are based in Parliament? After all, can't we find British kids to do these jobs? America isn't in the EU, so why should these people be allowed to be here, etc...
I don't recall anyone saying that we should have no Muslim researchers in Parliament either. We also have plenty of Chinese nationals working in PArliament. Why single out Russians, other than to play to Cold War fantasies?
Allegations or not she is innocent until proven guilty and the fact that she is Russian and blonde is not in itself enough to convict her.
There was a delightful set of sketches on (appropriately enough) The Goon Show at the time of the Profumo scandal. Will we see Hancock's Half Hour now?
Posted by: It doesn't add up... | December 05, 2010 at 01:13 PM
The question is, why did Mike Hancock allow her to table PQs on matters of national security when she was first suspected, very publicly, back in August? Hancock is widely known to be pro-Russian and pro-Putin (not terribly LibDem that, is it) – does he know more than he’s letting on? http://bit.ly/ihObE9
Posted by: MuscularLiberal | December 05, 2010 at 01:15 PM
Those in favour of unlimited non-EU immigration argue that commerce would be damaged if numbers were restricted. Presumably Mr Hancock engaged Ms Zatuliveter knowing she was a foreign national and he checked her right to work here.
But why was she given any such right? Is it seriously suggested there is no other person in the UK who would act as Mr Hancock's researcher so he needed to recruit from Russia?
The naivety of the LibDems knows no bounds - an MP for a defence base city and a member of a Parliamentary group involved with defence and he engaged a Russian national - unbelievable, but true.
Posted by: Andrew Smith | December 05, 2010 at 01:15 PM
"Moscow Centre" will of course have advised Hancock of her role???!!!!!!
Posted by: amon | December 05, 2010 at 01:22 PM
I couldn't care less about the girl; I think it's more likely that Hancock himself is a Russian spy.
Anyhoo, it all amounts to a rather lovely excuse to have Knacker of the Yard take a trip to chez Hancock and ask a few questions. Maybe we could get the Home Secretary and House of Commons authorities to have him removed on security grounds, at least until after the Tuition Fees vote?
Posted by: Matt Woods | December 05, 2010 at 01:24 PM
Mike Hancock has some problems. He is at the moment on police bail himself and it beggars all belief that the best assistant he could find is a Russian national.
Posted by: Victor Southern | December 05, 2010 at 01:28 PM
How would this silly man, our equivalent in his own quiet way of Berlusconi I fear, know whether she is a spy or not? Has he never heard for honey traps? This is also being covered on the comments page for those who might be interested. Hancock should resign. This is one serious gaff too far.
Posted by: Elaine Turner | December 05, 2010 at 01:30 PM
Yes, because we all know that if his researcher was in fact a russian spy Mr. Hancock would be the first to know... Given that spies have a tendency to respond favourably to the question 'sir, are you a spy?'
/sarcasm
Posted by: 13th spitfire | December 05, 2010 at 02:08 PM
Mike Hancock is a typical Liberal Democrat MP who is continually asking questions about our armed forces and our defence strategy on the pretence of freedom of information and generally making a nuisance of himself in Parliament.
Why do we want Liberal Democrat MPs like this who appear not to support the government in protecting the British people?
He is currently on bail for alleged indecent assault.
He employs a Russian girl as a researcher who is alleged to be a Russian Spy.
Mr Hancock is a liability and Nick Clegg needs to deal with this man and decide if he is required as a Liberal Democrat MP especially as they now have responsibility in Government.
Posted by: robert | December 05, 2010 at 02:41 PM
robert will have to work very hard to convince me that the government is currently protecting the British people. By what actions and with what resources, one wonders.
Posted by: Andrew Smith | December 05, 2010 at 03:13 PM
this MP is also a councillor in Portsmouth. time for all the papers to start ferreting.
Posted by: Alistair | December 05, 2010 at 03:36 PM
Russia is not a member of the EU. This woman came to "study" and then was allowed to stay and work. Is it seriously suggested that there are no young people here equipped and willing to be researchers for MPs? Spy or not, she should be sent home.
Posted by: Salmondnet | December 05, 2010 at 05:13 PM
Hmmm so Handycock, couldn't find a researcher who just happened, 'not' to be a 25 year old Russian female with long blonde hair, but then I'm sure she was more than adequately equipped in so many other ways.
The more people try to convince me that this Coalition will last till 2015 the less convinced I am.
Posted by: david1 | December 05, 2010 at 05:23 PM
Salmondnet
Mike Hancock probably couldn't find anyone in Portsmouth to do the job.
Posted by: Stephen | December 05, 2010 at 06:45 PM
If Mike Hancock couldn't find anyone in Portsmouth to do the job he seems to have had in mind, it is the only dock town in the country where that is true!
Posted by: Andrew Smith | December 05, 2010 at 07:00 PM
Doesn't Hancock advocate Unilaterial Nuclear disarmement?
Looking at comments about the other allegations and then his arreast, this bloke looks like he should not be parliament.
Added to which I think it is wrong for a MP to employ overseas staff, no wonder Liberal Democrats want an amnesty on illigal Immigrants and Unrestricted Immigration.
Posted by: Malcolm Butt | December 05, 2010 at 07:31 PM
In a city the size of Portsmouth surely there is a British born person who could have been Hancock's personal assistant, or researcher or whatever? Why did he need to employ a Russian?
Posted by: Martin Marprelate- A Man in the Street! | December 05, 2010 at 07:38 PM
I assume the impartial commenters will also assume that any good-looking Conservative assistants also only got their job due to their looks and make similarly unfounded insinuations.
Posted by: corporeal | December 05, 2010 at 10:20 PM
According to the Daily Mail who were obviously briefed by their favourite sppok:
" The MI5 officers who spoke to her appeared to know details of her love life, suggesting that she was under surveillance.
She is alleged to have had an affair with someone working at Nato, though a spokesman for the organisation said it had no knowledge of any such allegation."
I'd say that imply that insinuations are well founded.
Posted by: It doesn't add up... | December 05, 2010 at 11:18 PM
The insinuations I was referring to were that Hancock was having a physical relationship with her.
Posted by: corporeal | December 06, 2010 at 03:15 AM
I assume those who are advocating sacking this girl on the sole basis of her nationality also support sacking all the American interns and researchers that are based in Parliament? After all, can't we find British kids to do these jobs? America isn't in the EU, so why should these people be allowed to be here, etc...
I don't recall anyone saying that we should have no Muslim researchers in Parliament either. We also have plenty of Chinese nationals working in PArliament. Why single out Russians, other than to play to Cold War fantasies?
Allegations or not she is innocent until proven guilty and the fact that she is Russian and blonde is not in itself enough to convict her.
Posted by: Moscow Tory | December 06, 2010 at 12:20 PM