« WATCH: The late Sir David Frost interviews Baroness Thatcher, 1995 | Main

September 10, 2013

Comments

JoeDM

Most of the original Victorian rail companies went bust and bankrupted their investors !!!

Andrew Garnett

Disparate stuff on something we don't need, that the people appear not to want, at a time when we don't have the money.

Andrew Garnett

Should read "desperate"!

Elaine Turner

Trades and jobs flourished? They may well have done then, but who is going to get the jobs this time around? Will it be Brits? Was it Brits that made the Olympic Games venues... no!

It doesn't add up...

HS2 have lost the argument. The public is against it by 55 to 29 now the cost is admitted to be £50bn. They understand it is shockingly poor VFM.

John Moss

Yes. Victorian Engineering. The best that could be achieved - more than a Century ago.

Elizabethan engineering by contrast requires no tracks, bridges or tunnels, travels faster, links many more places and not just from point A to B, but from and between points A, B, C, D, E, F, etc etc.

It's called "flying".

robertnow

Save the Chilterns and save £80billion plus.

Unsere Web-Seite

Does your blog have a contact page? I'm having problems locating it but, I'd like to send you an email. I've got some recommendations for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it develop over time.

Handyvertrag Online

If some one needs to be updated with most up-to-date technologies then he must be pay a visit this web site and be up to date everyday.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Homepage

Categories

Options

Most Updated

Other Pages

Tracker

  • Extreme Tracking