Ken Livingstone gets angry
Ken Livingstone loses it in the London Assembly:
« Harriet Harman expresses confidence in Livingstone after stormy week | Main | BorisWatch's Boris for Mayor song »
Ken Livingstone loses it in the London Assembly:
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c61a053ef00e55059a12d8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Ken Livingstone gets angry:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Well done ken!
Posted by: James Cullis | February 19, 2008 at 05:01 PM
You have the wrong headline.
Not Ken Livingstone gets angry but Ken Livingstone loses it.
He is clearly unfit to be Mayor.
Posted by: CCHQ Spy | February 19, 2008 at 05:02 PM
All very politburo!
Posted by: Tony Makara | February 19, 2008 at 05:03 PM
He sounded pissed to me...again...
Posted by: Edward | February 19, 2008 at 05:28 PM
What an embarressment the man is. Now I know what it felt like to be an American and have Bush in the White House.
Posted by: Annie | February 19, 2008 at 05:37 PM
I've witnessed these meetings before. It's more like a baiting chamber than a debating chamber.
The arrogant sneering and jeering of some members there is worse than the HoC.
Well done to Ken for standing up for his staff.
Posted by: Anne | February 19, 2008 at 06:38 PM
Ken might have been pissed....reserve judgement until the facts are known.
Posted by: eugene | February 19, 2008 at 07:01 PM
Sadly, this clip is likely to endear people to him. Most people will think 'good on him' for standing up for himself against a bunch of self-serving non-entities and ego-maniacs (of all parties).
Posted by: Justin Hinchcliffe | February 19, 2008 at 09:32 PM
Whatever it is, i dont think he ever had it to lose.
Posted by: Conservative Homer | February 19, 2008 at 09:57 PM
I don't know who sits where as I don't live anywhere near London, but he seems to be making a reasonable request from the clip shown. He doesn't get irrational. His message is bitingly consistent. He asks for someone who evidently has earned the ire of the council to speak for himself. Seems pretty reasonable to me.
Posted by: Nick | February 20, 2008 at 11:15 PM