« WATCH: The late Sir David Frost interviews Baroness Thatcher, 1995 |
Posted at 07:49 PM in Transport | Permalink
Most of the original Victorian rail companies went bust and bankrupted their investors !!!
September 10, 2013 at 08:35 PM
Disparate stuff on something we don't need, that the people appear not to want, at a time when we don't have the money.
Andrew Garnett |
September 10, 2013 at 08:58 PM
Should read "desperate"!
Andrew Garnett |
September 10, 2013 at 08:59 PM
Trades and jobs flourished? They may well have done then, but who is going to get the jobs this time around? Will it be Brits? Was it Brits that made the Olympic Games venues... no!
Elaine Turner |
September 10, 2013 at 10:14 PM
HS2 have lost the argument. The public is against it by 55 to 29 now the cost is admitted to be £50bn. They understand it is shockingly poor VFM.
It doesn't add up... |
September 10, 2013 at 10:46 PM
Yes. Victorian Engineering. The best that could be achieved - more than a Century ago.
Elizabethan engineering by contrast requires no tracks, bridges or tunnels, travels faster, links many more places and not just from point A to B, but from and between points A, B, C, D, E, F, etc etc.
It's called "flying".
John Moss |
September 10, 2013 at 11:03 PM
Save the Chilterns and save £80billion plus.
September 11, 2013 at 08:09 AM
Does your blog have a contact page? I'm having problems locating it but, I'd like to send you an email. I've got some recommendations for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it develop over time.
Unsere Web-Seite |
September 29, 2013 at 03:39 PM
If some one needs to be updated with most up-to-date technologies then he must be pay a visit this web site and be up to date everyday.
Handyvertrag Online |
October 04, 2013 at 02:23 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.