« Daily Telegraph investigation finds Parliament Square's protest camp is almost deserted at night | Main | What impact could Italy's debt crisis have on the rest of Europe? »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c61a053ef0162fc39e9e5970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Lord Digby Jones: HS2 "will make Birmingham the most northern suburb of London":
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
He is in favour of HS2, and says it should go to the North and Scotland for economic and environmental benefits.
As for Birmingham being a suburb of London: the HS2 journey time will be 45-50 minutes. Peterborough is 45-50 minutes from Kings Cross, but I haven't heard anyone say that city is a suburb of London.
Posted by: Philip | November 08, 2011 at 03:06 PM
At the end of this I couldn`t decide whther the people discussing it were for or against the project.
I hope common sense will prevail: saving half an hour on a journey from London to Birmingham on this white elephant which would ruin part of our countryside is just barmy.
Knock it on the head, please.
Posted by: Edward Huxley | November 08, 2011 at 03:08 PM
There is nothing that truly makes the case for HS2, it is unwanted, unneeded, unaffordable and ultimately pointless grandstanding by the Green lobby who, as usual, have not even vaguely thought it through.
HS2 - Not wanted and a electoral millstone around our necks if the government are stupid enough to force it through.
Posted by: Mr Angry | November 08, 2011 at 03:19 PM
I made the case against the HS2 on my forum on July 29th. saying that flying there is faster..'The flight time from London, United Kingdom to Birmingham, United Kingdom is:
12 minutes...'
The flying time to other cities I pointed out also in the same post:-
http://www.rantonuk.org/forum/Blah.pl?m-1311962910/
We are already well served to travel to every city in the country by air, there is no need, or sense, in ripping up the countryside to give fortunes to Camerons business buddies with building firms - he also wants them to rip up the countryside to build real estate on!
Posted by: Tony Dean | November 08, 2011 at 03:24 PM
Philip @ 15:06 I am against HS2 as to me it starts and finishes at the wrong terminii in both Cities, it ought to be from St Pancras to Birmingham New Street not from an already overloaded Euston to some God forsaken station in the outskirts of Brum. In any event it is not needed and will do more damage to the environment than it would ever cure. It's a groundnut oil scheme on rails! A vanity project we simply cannot afford!
I would however say that Lord Digby Jones (Labour) is wrong in that Reading is only 20 minutes from Paddington by the fastest trains but has NOT become "The London Borough of Reading" but retains its own identity. How much more so Birmingham.
Posted by: Martin Marprelate- A Man in the Street! | November 08, 2011 at 06:18 PM
"As for Birmingham being a suburb of London"
The point he made was that anyone who thought Birmingham would benefit economically from HS2 was wrong, therefore I'm guessing the "suburb of London" bit meant that the only benefit would be potentially greater commuter traffic to London.
Posted by: A Public Sector Worker | November 09, 2011 at 07:58 AM