« Andrew Neil summarises the headline announcements in the Spending Review | Main | Nick Robinson first removes - and then smashes up - a protest placard »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c61a053ef0134885b0d4b970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brendan Barber of the TUC and David Frost of the British Chambers of Commerce debate the merits of the Spending Review:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Barber is really on the spot. Labour would have been his preferred government after the last election and even he can see that the country would have been broke by now had they become so. The present civiilian unrest in France, Union provoked, has seen him trying to remain reasonable in his approach here (`riot and disturbance is not the British way` - he has a short memory that clearly does not stretch back as far as the Miners Strike, Scargill and the Union destruction of the deep mine coal industry in the UK)
To hear the unreality of the Union ideas on our economic future shows what a menace they would have become had they remained the major paymaster of a Labour government with all that implies.
Barber is in an impossible position and this is a problem he shows no sign of solving
Posted by: john parkes | October 21, 2010 at 12:04 PM