« Sky News's Adam Boulton and Kay Burley analyse some of the correspondence released today about the release of the Lockerbie bomber | Main | Adam Boulton announces that Sky, BBC and ITN have agreed a proposal for three election debates between the leaders of the three main parties »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c61a053ef0120a558d8a9970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The BBC's 5.45am highlights of election night 1997 - how many moments would we have missed if the votes had been counted the next day?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Watching those 1997 highlights is still painful.
Posted by: twitter.com/TimMontgomerie | September 09, 2009 at 09:34 AM
Quite.
You can almost hear the champagne corks popping in the BBC corridors.
Posted by: neilreddin.wordpress.com | September 09, 2009 at 10:39 AM
That bloke Portaloo.... whatever happened to him?...Michael Gove wrote a book abt him called 'The Future of the Right'. Ha, bloody ha.
Posted by: Vulture | September 09, 2009 at 11:19 AM
In 2005 the proportion of seats declared on the night was even higher, with only 5 Great Britain seats scheduled to be counted the next day: Argyll, Hexham, Skipton, Berwick, and St Ives.
There were 3 others delayed by very close recounts: in Wirral West, Crawley, and Harlow (delayed to Saturday morning). Also the Staffs South result was delayed until the next month I think.
1997 - 624 out of 641 GB seats = 97.3%
2005 - 619 out of 628 GB seats = 98.6%
Posted by: Andy Stidwill | September 09, 2009 at 11:35 AM
Well gentlemen, all I can say is that 2010 will be a fine year (with any luck).
Posted by: Andrew S | September 09, 2009 at 03:29 PM
"At Sedgefield count Blair says he wants to rapay trust of voters."
A debt we're still waiting for.
Posted by: Hurf Durf | September 09, 2009 at 04:01 PM
The BBC even spoke rubbish in those days..''virtual wipeout of the Tory Party in the UK'' proclaims that Dimbleby bloke- big losses sure...'''virtual wipeout''- hhhmmmm....12 years later and the tide has reversed.
Posted by: eugene | September 09, 2009 at 05:19 PM
What a wonderful day that was. There was an incredible mood of optimism in Britain once again after 18 years of misery and misrule.
No matter what happens in May next year, it'll be nothing, absolutely nothing, compared to that.
Posted by: Account Deleted | September 11, 2009 at 12:40 AM
sometimes what we have to remember is that the govenment of the day will always lose votes after being elected. the 97 results was one of the biggest wipe outs of blue mp's for many a year and the lowest number of seats since 1906, if the tories are to form the next govenment it must not make the mistake of saying that it will do something and then do the oppisit, but the first job of the new govenment would be to cut national debt and give us all a little more money to play with, and before anyone asks im in the public sector, i work as a cleaner so don't get paid that much and would benifit from less tax on my savings and higher wages
Posted by: stuart gregory | September 11, 2009 at 02:11 AM